s390 qualification for Wheezy

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.

Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us
determine s390's status for the release.

Regards,

Adam
pp the Release Team

[Adam D. Barratt]

Post by Adam D. Barratt
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us
determine s390's status for the release.

*prod* just in case anyone did have any comments...

Regards,

Adam

[Philipp Kern]

Post by Adam D. Barratt

Post by Adam D. Barratt
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us
determine s390's status for the release.

*prod* just in case anyone did have any comments...

Not really. For wheezy I don't see a problem releasing with s390. For wheezy+1
it might not make sense, due to upstreams dropping s390 support and the fact
that few people use the 31bit toolchain.

With three buildds we're pretty much redundant now, package building is
generally very fast.

OTOH this arch is already marked as "yes" anyway
 ;-)

Kind regards
Philipp Kern