Discussion:
Bug#824449: firefox: FTBFS on sparc64 due to wrong platform definitions
(too old to reply)
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-05-11 19:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Hi!

With Firefox 60.0 ESR now in experimental, most of the sparc64-related patches
are now part of the upstream source.

The only patches we actually need are the one to fix skia on big-endian targets
(I am currently in the process of upstreaming this one) and one tiny patch
to fix an alignment issue on sparc64.

Attaching both of them. The skia patch will also fix the build on s390x.

Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - ***@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - ***@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-05-11 21:30:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
The only patches we actually need are the one to fix skia on big-endian targets
(I am currently in the process of upstreaming this one) and one tiny patch
to fix an alignment issue on sparc64.
For the record, the latter was explicitly rejected.
I know. However, the person who wrote it is a security expert (and a friend of
mine) and I trust him when he says the patch does not change any behavior or
lower the security.

Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - ***@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - ***@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Mike Hommey
2018-05-11 22:20:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi!
With Firefox 60.0 ESR now in experimental, most of the sparc64-related patches
are now part of the upstream source.
The only patches we actually need are the one to fix skia on big-endian targets
(I am currently in the process of upstreaming this one) and one tiny patch
to fix an alignment issue on sparc64.
For the record, the latter was explicitly rejected.

Mike

Loading...