Discussion:
Squeeze install successful, now a NIC / OSA / eth0 problem
(too old to reply)
The VM Wizard
2012-04-13 01:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Ok, here I am again..... I got Squeeze squeezed onto 4 3390-27's and IPL'd the newly installed system from where the zIPL loader had put it.
Everything was going smoothly until it came time to deal with the eth0 interface, and then out came this..... ( from the console log )

[ 41.260175] dasde:VOL1/ LX0296: dasde1
[ 41.317430] qeth: loading core functions
[ 41.757291] qeth: register layer 3 discipline
[ 41.777369] qdio: 0.0.e205 OSA on SC 12 using AI:0 QEBSM:0 PCI:1 TDD:0 SIGA:RWSAO
[ 41.815528] qeth 0.0.e203: Device is a OSD Express card (level: 035f)
[ 41.815541] with link type OSD_100 (portname: )
[ 41.819180] qeth 0.0.e203: Hardware IP fragmentation not supported on eth0
[ 41.821213] qeth 0.0.e203: VLAN enabled
[ 41.822182] qeth 0.0.e203: Multicast enabled
[ 41.826185] qeth 0.0.e203: IPV6 enabled
[ 41.828183] qeth 0.0.e203: Broadcast enabled
[ 41.829197] qeth 0.0.e203: Setting up broadcast echo filtering for eth0 failed
[ 41.829254] qeth 0.0.e203: Using SW checksumming on eth0.
[ 41.829311] qeth 0.0.e203: Outbound TSO not supported on eth0
[ 42.087099] udev[178]: renamed network interface eth0 to eth5
done."

Notice how "eth0" gets renamed to "eth5" ( this copied version gets incremented by "1" every time I IPL .. don't know why either )

Anyway... a few lines later, it wants to work with "eth0" which is now no longer available, having been renamed to something else, and
we get this :

Setting kernel variables ...done."
Configuring network interfaces...SIOCSIFADDR: No such device"
eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device"
SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device"
SIOCSIFBRDADDR: No such device"
eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device"
eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device"
Failed to bring up eth0."
done."

So... being the Linux Crash-Test Dummy that I am ....
why is "eth0" being renamed at every IPL ? which causes the apparent startup of "eth0"
to fail a few lines later ? I tried doing a "ifup eth5" during this most recent IPL and it acted
as if it had no idea what "eth5" was.

Any suggestions or guidance will be appreciated, as always. Thanks.

This is a z800 with both FENET and GIGABIT OSA cards, I've tried both and they give this
same error problem. I remember during the install it asked if I wanted to use "Layer 2" or
"Layer 3" and I gave it the "default".
The Fungi
2012-04-13 04:40:01 UTC
Permalink
On 2012-04-12 20:24:34 -0600 (-0600), The VM Wizard wrote:
[...]
Post by The VM Wizard
why is "eth0" being renamed at every IPL ? which causes the
apparent startup of "eth0" to fail a few lines later ?
[...]

Sounds like the MAC of your interface might be different at every
boot, and so the udev startup thinks it's a different interface each
time. Does /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules contain lines
for multiple interfaces, each with a different MAC?
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829);
WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP(***@yuggoth.org); FINGER(***@yuggoth.org);
MUD(***@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); IRC(***@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl); }
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-***@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact ***@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/***@yuggoth.org
Philipp Kern
2012-04-13 07:20:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by The VM Wizard
Notice how "eth0" gets renamed to "eth5" ( this copied version gets
incremented by "1" every time I IPL .. don't know why either )
Sadly that's a known problem with the udev rules. Just do this for the time
being:

touch /etc/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
rm /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules

I'll try to put this back onto the agenda for wheezy.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-***@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact ***@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/***@spike.0x539.de
v***@ix.netcom.com
2012-04-13 13:30:02 UTC
Permalink
That did it ! Thank you. I installed "everything" because we want to see all the possibilities a Linux system might give us, even on a z-Series. Our first experiment will be with a database of some kind.

Kind regards
CLP


-----Original Message-----
Sent: Apr 13, 2012 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: Squeeze install successful, now a NIC / OSA / eth0 problem
Post by The VM Wizard
Notice how "eth0" gets renamed to "eth5" ( this copied version gets
incremented by "1" every time I IPL .. don't know why either )
Sadly that's a known problem with the udev rules. Just do this for the time
touch /etc/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
rm /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
I'll try to put this back onto the agenda for wheezy.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-***@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact ***@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/***@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net
Philipp Kern
2012-08-13 16:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
Post by The VM Wizard
Notice how "eth0" gets renamed to "eth5" ( this copied version gets
incremented by "1" every time I IPL .. don't know why either )
this is now filed as Debian bug #684766 against udev.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Loading...